Continuing our discussion on the video we find that Mr. Naik contradicts his own statement made at the fag end of the last video.
0.05 : He says "They called it the Big Bang"
How very convenient of Mr. Naik. He is the only person I have heard who has managed to drop the word theory. In all the scientific papers and magazines and journals I have come across not once I repeat not once has any scientist referred to The Big Bang Theory as the big bang. It is very much a theory and a hypotheses which might or might not stand the test of time. In his eagerness to prove that the Koran revels scientific facts Mr. Naik goes overboard and claims the theory as a scientific fact. This as I have already pointed out is inconsistent with his own statement that he will not be speaking about scientific theories and hypothesis. Perhaps the only proof Mr. Naik needs to prove or disprove a theory is the Koran.
0.55 : "The heavens and the earths were joined together"
This is the description Mr. Naik gives of the Big Bang Theory as stated in the Koran. Mr. Naik is so blinded by his fame and fortune that he either thinks that all the listeners are naive or plain stupid. This description is not only insufficient and vague it is also irrelevant. Mr. Naik there were no heavens or the earth preceding the big bang nor even immediately after it. I sometimes am surprised at the audacity of this man's proclamations and wonder does he himself believe in those or in the heart of hearts he is laughing at the sheer stupidity of his audience.
2.06 : He refers to the matter present immediately after the big bang to as smoke.
Well smoke for me is a product of combustion that is the process of the combination of other atoms with the atoms of oxygen. This reaction is exothermic, so normally smoke is at an elevated temperature. Well Mr. Naik the process of combustion was not possible immediately following the big bang. What Mr. naik is trying to pass off is that since the gaseous matter present was at an elevated temperature, he wants us to believe that it was smoke. There is a difference between a hot gas and smoke.
2:45 : The Koran according to Mr. Naik says that " Allah merges the night into the day and day in to the night"
well nothing wrong in the statement, but the interpretation that Mr. Naik draws from it. He says that since the Koran describes the process as "coiling" that means that the process was gradual. Well for starters we dont need the Koran to tell us that the transition from day to night and night to day is gradual and not sudden. This fact is known by mere observation to any intelligent person, but unfortunately Mr. Naik needs the Koran to tell him that. This fact must have been observed by millions of people who had preceded the Prophet, so there again is nothing new in that.
Mr. Naik draws one more conclusion from the statement that since it is said that the Koran says the process is gradual that means that the Koran says the earth is round. Now this is stretching the interpretation a wee to much. I mean millions of people who haven't read the Koran can also say the same thing.
09:27 : Mr. Naik went to a school that taught him that the sun is stationary.
Well I don't really know which school did Mr. Naik go to must have been some madrassa. Though I don't really remember what was taught to me, I am quite sure that I never had the impression that the sun was stationary.
0.05 : He says "They called it the Big Bang"
How very convenient of Mr. Naik. He is the only person I have heard who has managed to drop the word theory. In all the scientific papers and magazines and journals I have come across not once I repeat not once has any scientist referred to The Big Bang Theory as the big bang. It is very much a theory and a hypotheses which might or might not stand the test of time. In his eagerness to prove that the Koran revels scientific facts Mr. Naik goes overboard and claims the theory as a scientific fact. This as I have already pointed out is inconsistent with his own statement that he will not be speaking about scientific theories and hypothesis. Perhaps the only proof Mr. Naik needs to prove or disprove a theory is the Koran.
0.55 : "The heavens and the earths were joined together"
This is the description Mr. Naik gives of the Big Bang Theory as stated in the Koran. Mr. Naik is so blinded by his fame and fortune that he either thinks that all the listeners are naive or plain stupid. This description is not only insufficient and vague it is also irrelevant. Mr. Naik there were no heavens or the earth preceding the big bang nor even immediately after it. I sometimes am surprised at the audacity of this man's proclamations and wonder does he himself believe in those or in the heart of hearts he is laughing at the sheer stupidity of his audience.
2.06 : He refers to the matter present immediately after the big bang to as smoke.
Well smoke for me is a product of combustion that is the process of the combination of other atoms with the atoms of oxygen. This reaction is exothermic, so normally smoke is at an elevated temperature. Well Mr. Naik the process of combustion was not possible immediately following the big bang. What Mr. naik is trying to pass off is that since the gaseous matter present was at an elevated temperature, he wants us to believe that it was smoke. There is a difference between a hot gas and smoke.
2:45 : The Koran according to Mr. Naik says that " Allah merges the night into the day and day in to the night"
well nothing wrong in the statement, but the interpretation that Mr. Naik draws from it. He says that since the Koran describes the process as "coiling" that means that the process was gradual. Well for starters we dont need the Koran to tell us that the transition from day to night and night to day is gradual and not sudden. This fact is known by mere observation to any intelligent person, but unfortunately Mr. Naik needs the Koran to tell him that. This fact must have been observed by millions of people who had preceded the Prophet, so there again is nothing new in that.
Mr. Naik draws one more conclusion from the statement that since it is said that the Koran says the process is gradual that means that the Koran says the earth is round. Now this is stretching the interpretation a wee to much. I mean millions of people who haven't read the Koran can also say the same thing.
09:27 : Mr. Naik went to a school that taught him that the sun is stationary.
Well I don't really know which school did Mr. Naik go to must have been some madrassa. Though I don't really remember what was taught to me, I am quite sure that I never had the impression that the sun was stationary.
No comments:
Post a Comment